Prospector Knowledge Center Logo Prospector Knowledge Center Print Logo

Prospector Knowledge Center

Welcome to the blog for UL Prospector, the most comprehensive raw material search engine for product developers.

UL Logo UL Print Logo
  • Home
  • Sustainability
    • Articles
    • Webinars
  • Personal Care & Cosmetics
    • Articles
    • Webinars
    • Industry Search Engine
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
  • Plastics
    • Articles
    • Webinars
    • Industry Search Engine
  • Paint & Coatings
    • Articles
    • Webinars
    • Industry Search Engine
  • Cleaners
    • Articles
    • Webinars
    • Industry Search Engine
  • Food, Beverage & Nutrition
    • Articles
    • Webinars
    • Industry Search Engine
  • Lubricants
    • Articles
    • Industry Search Engine

Natural Preservatives: A Continuing Discourse

Posted on October 28, 2016 by Priscilla Taylor

Share this article:     

How can you balance support of natural preservatives in cosmetics with efficacy and affordability? Expert Priscilla Taylor offers some insight in the Prospector Knowledge Center.
Copyright: dolgachov / 123RF Stock Photo

The general topic of natural ingredients in cosmetics has been extensively covered in industry literature and forums, as well as various Knowledge Center articles.

If the questions submitted by Prospector members are any indication, the level of interest in the broader topic of “naturals” and the subtopic of natural preservatives in cosmetics remains high. Although natural preservatives were thoroughly discussed in “Natural Preservatives and Colorants,” the present article aims to address some lingering questions on balancing support of a natural concept with efficacy and affordability.

Supporting a Natural Concept

First and foremost, what is the definition of “natural” within personal care? Several authors have addressed this question but the definition offered in “The Challenge of Natural Cosmetics” is worth restating:

Perhaps the biggest challenge is to figure out what your company considers ‘natural.’ There is no single definition and the number of different standards out there is overwhelming. As a formulator, you’ll want to get specific direction on exactly which ingredients you’re allowed to use and which to avoid. If your company doesn’t know, then you should just choose one of the leading natural cosmetic standards and stick with it.”

Getting specific direction from your company or customer cannot be over emphasized as there are varying perceptions among consumers about what makes a product “natural.” Most common is the belief that a “natural” ingredient must be recognizable and not sound “chemical” – which is a viewpoint that your marketing team may want to promote to enhance consumer appeal.

To meet this objective, a formulator can consider products that have been developed as alternatives to synthetic preservatives. Examples of products positioned as “natural” or naturally-derived preservatives include:

    • Neopein® by Bio-Botanica:
      • INCI Name: Origanum Vulgare Extract (and) Thymus Vulgaris (Thyme) Extract (and) Olea Europaea (Olive) Leaf Extract (and) Rosmarinus Officinalis (Rosemary) Leaf Extract (and) Lavandula Angustifolia (Lavender) Flower Extract (and) Hydrastis Canadensis (Goldenseal) Root Extract
    • Sharon Biomix Free II Liquid by Acme Hardesty Co.:
      • INCI Name: Phenylpropanol (and) Glycerin (and) Citrus Aurantium Amara (Bitter Orange) Fruit Extract (and) Citrus Reticulata (Tangerine) Fruit Extract (and) Citrus Aurantium Sinensis Peel Extract (and) Ascorbic Acid (and) Lactic Acid (and) Citric Acid (and) Aqua
    • MicroCurb™ OC by Kemin:
      • INCI Name: Caprylic Acid (and) Origanum Vulgare Leaf Extract
    • Natural Preservier™ by Premier Specialities:
      • INCI Name: Water (and) Gluconic Acid (and) Sodium Benzoate

Efficacy

The concern among formulators regarding the effectiveness of natural preservatives in cosmetics is understandable, given their relatively short history of use and body of efficacy data as compared to that available for traditional preservatives. Whether it is natural or synthetic, the basic function of any preservative is to prevent or retard microbial growth in the finished product. As such, ensuring that a product is well preserved is a critical aspect of formula development.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data are usually provided by suppliers and should be carefully reviewed when considering a preservative. While this information can be useful, preservation efficacy testing on the formula being considered for launch would provide the formulator with an understanding of the product’s microbiological integrity.

Affordability

A formulator is often tasked with delivering a product to meet all development objectives within a given budget. While this sometimes could be the most challenging aspect of the development process, the temptation to curtail costs by using less than optimum levels of preservatives should be avoided – for reasons outlined above. If natural preservatives are required to support the overall product concept, but are found to negatively impact cost, and negotiations with the supplier were not fruitful, then further discussions with marketing or the customer may be warranted to establish more realistic cost targets.

Identifying a preservative system that would support a natural product concept might present a challenge but should not necessarily be considered an impossible task. Healthy relationships with suppliers, maintaining an awareness of cross-category technology developments (primarily food and personal care) and keeping an open mind to innovation, can often help illuminate a path to success.

For further reading on natural cosmetics, see:

  • The Challenge of Natural Cosmetics
  • Formulating with Natural Surfactants
  • Natural Preservatives and Colorants 

The views, opinions and technical analyses presented here are those of the author or advertiser, and are not necessarily those of ULProspector.com or UL. The appearance of this content in the UL Prospector Knowledge Center does not constitute an endorsement by UL or its affiliates.

All content is subject to copyright and may not be reproduced without prior authorization from UL or the content author.

The content has been made available for informational and educational purposes only. While the editors of this site may verify the accuracy of its content from time to time, we assume no responsibility for errors made by the author, editorial staff or any other contributor.

UL does not make any representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy, applicability, fitness or completeness of the content. UL does not warrant the performance, effectiveness or applicability of sites listed or linked to in any content.

Share this article:     

Filed Under: Personal Care & Cosmetics Tagged With: Category Overview

About Priscilla Taylor

Priscilla Taylor joined Prospector in May, 2013 as an expert in personal care and cosmetics. In this role, she provides invaluable insight by consulting on all matters related to the industry. Her significant contributions to site optimizations and ingredient classifications enhance user experience on ULProspector.com.

Priscilla’s expertise was developed during her 21 years as a product development professional. She began her career in the 90’s at Helene-Curtis Industries in Chicago, where she discovered her passion for putting a product together from concept to completion. When Helene-Curtis was purchased by industry giant Unilever in 1996, Priscilla was promoted to Senior Product Development Manager. She had the privilege of working with global teams to develop and launch products both domestically and worldwide for many popular brands, including Dove and Suave.

Concurrent to her work at Prospector, Priscilla is a Product Development Chemist with Bria Research Labs. She is actively involved in formulating for a diverse array of clients. While she mostly formulates personal care and cosmetics products, she has also had the opportunity to work on projects for the household, industrial and institutional cleaners industry.

Priscilla was born and raised in Trinidad, West Indies, but she considers Chicago her adopted hometown. She lives there with her daughter, Jessica, and her Dachshund, Peanut, who assist her with her favorite pastime: cheering on Chicago’s famed sports teams.

8 Responses to “Natural Preservatives: A Continuing Discourse”

  1. RMD says:
    October 30, 2016 at 9:04 pm

    Thank you Priscilla!

  2. Bruno says:
    November 1, 2016 at 2:08 am

    Thanks a lot

  3. Wilfried Petersen says:
    November 1, 2016 at 3:50 am

    Dear Priscilla,

    with the much broader consensus regarding the term “natural” in Europe there is also a common understanding what has to be considered as “natural preservation”. All natural preservation systems have in common that they are not made from fossil carbon source. They may either be extracted from natural (vegetable) sources or made from naturally derived building blocks by simple chemical conversions. In the past 20 years a large number of scientific publications has been published providing at least in parts information regarding reliable preservation options for natural and organic personal care products in addition to the petrochemically derived preservatives permitted by the most accepted natural and organic cosmetic standards. For those being interested in the topic here is a list in chronological order:

    Petersen, W. Antimicrobial ingredients for self-preserving cosmetics. Euro Cosmetics, 1999, Feb, 28-36.
    Jaenichen, J.; Johnson, C.H. Keeping the balance. Soap Perfumery & Cosmetics, 2005, Sept, 81-90.
    Ibarra, F.; Johnson, C.H. Natural preservation from concepts in nature. Cosmetics & Toiletries, 2008, March, 81-90.
    Ibarra, F. Effective preservation with multifunctional naturals. Personal Care, 2008, Sept, 86-88.
    A. Varvaresou, A.; Papageorgiou S.; Tsirivas, E.; Protopapa E.; Kintziou H.; Kefala V.; Demetzos C. Self-preserving cosmetics. Int. J. Cosm. Sci., 2009 (31) 163–175.
    Ibarra, F. Effective Preservation with Natural Multifunctional Ingredients. Happi, 2012.
    Thiemann, A.; Jänichen, J. The Formulator’s Guide to Safe Cosmetic Preservation. Personal Care Europe, 2014, Nov, 39-43.
    Thiemann, A.; Petersen, W. Emulsifier system influences O/W emulsion preservation. Personal Care Europe, 2016, Feb, 60-62.

    Best regards

  4. MARIA EL KURDI says:
    November 1, 2016 at 8:25 am

    Do all of the Natural Preservatives listed above work at a ph below 6.00 ?
    Could you recommend any that will work above a ph of 7.00.

  5. steve schnittger says:
    November 1, 2016 at 8:32 am

    Priscilla
    The one main issue that you are not discussing and is always a concern for the microbiologist is stability and long term efficacy. As these molecules that you are recommending may do well in a 28 day challenge test in a very simple water in oil emulsion the long term stability of these compounds needs to be guaranteed and documented.
    The second concern is that MIC values are great as initial screening tools but once the material goes into a cosmetic emulsion matrix all of those values go out the window.
    A third point is with us using more exotic raw materials such as silicones, film formers and wetting agents these natural preservatives do not always work in these systems. I would not consider them broad spectrum but are very limited in their application due to odor, compatibility, etc..

  6. Cynthia Hill says:
    November 1, 2016 at 9:27 am

    Thank you Pricilla for sharing this valuble information natural preservation.
    Cynthia

  7. Mohamed Abdulla says:
    November 1, 2016 at 3:10 pm

    Thank you Priscilla.

    I would ask folks to also look at Aminat G. This is a cationic ingredient but one of the natural preservatives that many of our customers are looking at.

    I also agree with Steve that all formulations and potential ingredients should be challenged tested and documented.

  8. ROBERT J. VERDICCHIO says:
    November 2, 2016 at 9:03 am

    We have found that combinations are necessary to pass OTC challenge test in most cases Dr Bob

Comments are closed.

Follow Prospector

  

Related Articles

More "Personal Care & Cosmetics" articles:
  • Guilty of Greenwashing Without Realizing It?
  • Formulating with Niacinamide
  • Implements, Devices, and Nonsurgical Cosmetic Procedures that Improve Skin Appearance
About Prospector
  • Company Information
  • Contact Us
  • Call for Knowledge Center Contributors
Industry Search Engines
  • Adhesives & Sealants
  • Food, Beverage & Nutrition
  • Graphic Arts & Inks
  • Household, Industrial & Institutional Cleaners
  • Lubricant & Metalworking Fluids
  • Paint & Coatings
  • Personal Care & Cosmetics
  • Plastics, Metals & Additives
Prospector

7930 Santa Fe, 3rd Floor
Overland Park, KS 66204 USA

Phone: 913-307-9010

UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC © 2023 All Rights Reserved. | Online Policies | Site Map
Find Ingredients Faster on ULProspector.com